Aggressive And Highly Successful Advocates For Defendants In Federal Criminal Prosecutions And Investigations Brought By United States Attorneys’ Offices

0:04
we’ve had eight separate cases where the

0:08
jury has returned uh not a single count

0:11
of guilty against our clients meaning

0:14
that in seven out of eight of those

0:16
cases the client is walking totally free

0:18
in the eighth case there was one count

0:21
against our client but that was a

0:23
mistried case a mistried count so eight

0:27
occasions where essentially the jury

0:29
didn’t find our client guilty of a

0:31
single count which is highly unusual in

0:33
federal court you have a lot of lawyers

0:34
who unfortunately have not experienced

0:37
the thrill of a not guilty in federal

0:39
court in a criminal trial some have

0:41
experienced once or twice and we’ve been

0:43
on that board about eight times which is

0:45
highly unusual and so that’s kind of one

0:48
of our calling cards our ability to be

0:50
successful against the feds in criminal

0:52
trials in Chicago and elsewhere

0:04
my experience in handling cases on

0:07
behalf of defendants and federal

0:08
criminal cases is extremely wide a lot

0:11
of the cases surprisingly would seem

0:13
like they would be typically state court

0:14
cases so a wide variety of drug cases

0:18
gun cases cases such as carjackings

0:22
kidnappings bank robberies surprising to

0:25
some people a lot of those what are

0:27
called sort of Street crimes are federal

0:29
cases but also some of the larger cases

0:32
that we handled are things like murder

0:34
for hire in federal court Health Care

0:37
fraud on a regular basis bank fraud

0:41
conspiracy wire fraud mail fraud because

0:45
of our length of time I’ve been

0:46
practicing probably handled every type

0:48
of federal criminal offense that you can

0:50
imagine but in terms of the white collar

0:52
cases which is one of our Hallmarks they

0:55
typically tend to be in their domain of

0:57
healthcare fraud bank fraud mortgage

1:00
fraud some sort of fraud scheme that

1:03
allows the feds to charge the k

1:04
typically because there’s a wire fraud

1:07
element to whatever the fraudulent

1:09
scheme is that you can imagine that

1:11
could be charged in federal court

0:05
a lawyer for a federal criminal case I

0:07
think there’s a multitude of factors but

0:09
several basic ones first of all does the

0:12
lawyer have a deep experiencing handling

0:14
Federal cases because there is a lot of

0:17
difference in terms of procedure law and

0:20
nuance and sort of courtroom decorum in

0:23
federal court versus state court so I’d

0:25
want an attorney who has a wide body of

0:27
federal experience number two and most

0:30
practically is an attorney who’s had

0:32
success actually winning Federal jury

0:35
trials because there’s only two options

0:37
in a federal case it’s either going to

0:38
plead or it’s going to go to trial so

0:40
I’d certainly want to know has this

0:43
attorney has they have they stepped

0:44
before a jury have they experienced the

0:46
success of getting not guilty jury

0:48
verdicts in federal court of course if

0:50
I’m a consumer or Advocate or anybody

0:53
I’d probably want to hire the person

0:55
that wins more often versus the person

0:58
who’s never won a case in federal court

0:59
so those would be key factors and the

1:02
last part would be just a comfort level

1:04
with the attorney again of the fact that

1:06
they feel that they can have a

1:08
relationship with them that they have a

1:10
hundred percent confidence that that

1:12
person is going to do everything they

1:14
can to either win the case at trial or

1:16
to get the most favorable plea agreement

1:18
that they can just a level of trust and

1:20
confidence and respect between the

1:23
lawyer and the client

0:04
the federal sentencing guidelines are at

0:07
the Forefront of any criminal case from

0:09
your initial evaluation of the case

0:12
to assessing your odds at trial and

0:15
making a risk benefit with your client

0:16
and then of course if your client is

0:18
found guilty at the sentencing phase but

0:21
what they really are are series of

0:23
guidelines or rules that the courts

0:25
apply in federal cases which primarily

0:28
takes into two factors the offense level

0:31
that’s assigned to the crime meaning a

0:33
higher number would correspond with what

0:36
people believe to be the sentencing

0:38
commission believes to be a a more

0:39
serious offense and the second

0:41
significant factor would be the

0:43
defendant’s criminal history on how many

0:45
other occasions have they been convicted

0:47
of crimes but the federal sentencing

0:49
guidings have also changed in a real

0:51
significant way over the last 10 years

0:53
and now there’s something called the

0:55
3553 factors that the courts recognize

0:59
where we as attorneys can really bring

1:01
to the attention almost anything that

1:03
would be considered mitigating evidence

1:05
that should be considered in the court

1:07
sort of taking a holistic view of the

1:10
defendant but the reason why why people

1:12
place so much emphasis on the federal

1:14
sentencing guidelines are the often very

1:16
Draconian penalties associated with

1:19
federal crimes you might have a client

1:21
who’s facing a mandatory minimum

1:23
sentence of 10 years or 15 years or 20

1:27
years those are stiff sentences and

1:29
sometimes it might be up to life so you

1:32
have to be extremely confident in your

1:34
attorney that they have the ability to

1:36
take your case to trial because

1:38
sometimes you really don’t have any

1:40
choice a client’s often not going to

1:42
take sitting down without a trial 10 or

1:45
15 or 20 years or up to a life sentence

1:47
without going to trial so the selection

1:51
of a trial attorney who can take your

1:53
case to try out the federal level and

1:54
win is of Paramount importance

0:04
work has been pretty wide and varied

0:07
I’ve actually argued appeals in the

0:10
state of California in the Supreme Court

0:12
of Idaho in other Federal circuits but

0:15
the emphasis because we’re at Chicago

0:17
based is the seventh Circuit Court of

0:19
Appeals where I’ve argued many Federal

0:22
Criminal and Civil Appeals before the

0:24
seventh circuit and then also an

0:25
Illinois state court before the Illinois

0:28
Pelt courts in various locations in the

0:30
state arguing criminal cases on appeal

0:33
and also civil cases and that’s a much

0:36
different process and experience because

0:38
obviously you’re not before a trial

0:40
court judge you’re before a tribunal of

0:43
three judges and the fun part and the I

0:46
guess the exciting and scary part of

0:48
doing a pill work is that you know the

0:50
judges get to ask you whatever they want

0:52
whenever they want and interrupt you in

0:54
the middle of your argument so I think

0:56
it’s kind of a fun challenge as an

0:58
attorney to be able to think on your

1:00
feet and be the type of individual that

1:02
can just get peppered with questions and

1:04
be ready for you know sort of all comers

0:04
probably like to talk about what one of

0:06
our most recent wins in January of 2023

0:10
we represent an individual who was a

0:13
high-ranking employee of a medical

0:15
device company and the case went to

0:17
trial here in federal court in Chicago

0:18
for a couple of weeks and we had been

0:21
working with a client since 2019 so it

0:24
was a culmination of four years of

0:26
effort and you know really a

0:29
firm belief from the get-go that this

0:32
client never should have been charged

0:34
that Not only was she not guilty but she

0:37
was innocent and after a two-week trial

0:39
after hearing from a dozen Witnesses or

0:41
so the jury returned to verdictive not

0:43
guilty on all charges against her and

0:46
it’s memorable in the sense that you

0:48
know going out with the client

0:49
afterwards to celebrate with her and her

0:51
mother to see the smile on her face it

0:54
really almost felt like I was with a

0:56
different person so I’ll always remember

0:58
that smile and and the real person

1:01
coming out after it’s sort of this

1:03
burden had been lifted from her out

1:05
there this four-year battle